,




With the new additions to the front of the car, our car now turns in very nicely with very little body roll and no understeer at all. This is one of the best McPherson strut cars we have yet to drive! Stay tuned, we will continue to work over the rear suspension and do some track testing of our car so far vs a stock FR-S. Good stuff is coming!
Sources
Want more Project FR-S? MotoIQ Project Scion FR-S
2 comments
Mike,
Appreciate all your suspension articles on motoiq.
If I understand correctly the stock alignment spec is:
Camber: 0, Caster: 5°54′, Steering Axis Inclination: 15°31′ , Toe: 0mm
and the modified is:
Camber: 3.5 deg neg, Caster: 8°, Steering Axis Inclination: 11° , Toe: 3mm toe out
The camber, castor and toe all seem pretty conventional (and good) mods for getting good turn in, good mid corner front end grip and a car that is responsive to the wheel without getting to spookiness and instability. I am intrigued, and have to admit my ability to think about the geometry without a model is at its limit.
Is the effort of reducing the steering axis inclination about minimising scrub radius? Or is it something more.
In short, could you explain a little more what your aims and ideas are around “We prefer to run minimal scrub and lead the caster with king pin angle by a few degrees.”?
Tuning JDM and British cars I never found an extra degree of castor I didn’t like, but can admit to never being up for exploring KPI. Though with an adjustable strut top and camber pins on a mcpherson strut its very very doable.
Thanks!
David
Actually reducing KPI increases scrub but it also makes for more wheel tilt in the wrong direction that is countered by the caster.