When you look at a Full Race manifold, it’s easy to place it into the “equal length” category, which is a popular design in the racing world. What people don’t realize, however, is that Full Race isn’t just a company with expertise at building manifolds, it also really knows the RB26 and its reported tendency to run slightly leaner in cylinder #6. Full Race’s manifold uses a runner geometry that is adjusted accordingly. Says Raicer, “the Full-Race RB26 manifold is designed with a differing pressure drop. The lowest pressure drop starts from cylinder #1 (which is the longest straight at the head flange) to an increasing pressure drop all the way to cylinder #6. This gives a +7% pressure drop [at cylinder #6] compared to cylinder #1. This is a big part of the reason why equal-length is not the end-all that most think it is–pressure drop is the key metric; and it should be tailored depending on the unique operating parameters of each individual engine.”
I am really glad that you are not going for an all-out TQ number. There’s so much more to an engine than it’s TQ/HP number. Most people don’t really know that there’s much more to an engine than how much TQ it produces.
Case in point: Gordon Murray’s T.50 NA V12 revs at 28,400 RPM per second.
hi guys, thanks for the replies. Next two articles are in the works as we speak!
Joe, I think I understand what you’re saying with the 28400 RPM “per second”, as in the rate of RPM acceleration. Just so others aren’t confused, it’s like–when free-revving in neutral–it’ll *theoretically* rev to 28400 RPM if you floor/free-rev it for one 1sec. Murray’s actual [beast of a] car has a 12100 RPM rev *limit*, which is still insane for that size of a motor. And thanks for the compliments. Yes driving this car is so different from the Supra in every aspect, I’m just having so much more fun in it. I very much want to floor it more often than in the Supra (which is more of an “event”) since it is more top-end based. And I just love the RB’s sound, even moreso now with the wastegate plumbed back into the exhaust. Stay tuned as that’s what I discuss in the next one! 🙂 thanks guys.
4 comments
Great Article, Really excited to see how this goes!
I am really glad that you are not going for an all-out TQ number. There’s so much more to an engine than it’s TQ/HP number. Most people don’t really know that there’s much more to an engine than how much TQ it produces.
Case in point: Gordon Murray’s T.50 NA V12 revs at 28,400 RPM per second.
Tease!
hi guys, thanks for the replies. Next two articles are in the works as we speak!
Joe, I think I understand what you’re saying with the 28400 RPM “per second”, as in the rate of RPM acceleration. Just so others aren’t confused, it’s like–when free-revving in neutral–it’ll *theoretically* rev to 28400 RPM if you floor/free-rev it for one 1sec. Murray’s actual [beast of a] car has a 12100 RPM rev *limit*, which is still insane for that size of a motor. And thanks for the compliments. Yes driving this car is so different from the Supra in every aspect, I’m just having so much more fun in it. I very much want to floor it more often than in the Supra (which is more of an “event”) since it is more top-end based. And I just love the RB’s sound, even moreso now with the wastegate plumbed back into the exhaust. Stay tuned as that’s what I discuss in the next one! 🙂
thanks guys.