Project Budget 400WHP S197 Mustang Track Car: Part 4 – Installing the Roush 3rd Link

Upgrading the 3rd link suspension arm in an S197 Mustangs is far more important than just to reduce wheel hop.  Picking the right one will greatly affect the car’s handling and rear grip (and we all know Mustangs need rear grip). To improve the performance of our budget track car, we install the best 3rd Link on the market, from Roush Performance.

3-link rear suspensionThe S197 Mustang has a 3-link rear suspension with a Panhard Bar that is transversely mounted and locates the solid axle laterally when cornering.  The 3 longitudinal links consist of 2 lower control arms and the upper “3rd Link”.

The 3rd Link suspension arm plays a crucial role in how the S197 Mustang handles and its ability to put power to the ground when exiting corners.  Aftermarket links are often marketed simply to reduce “wheel hop”, but it’s far more important that just that.

Going with bushings that are too stiff will reduce rear grip and performance on a road course and increase NVH, transmitting unwanted vibrations and harmonics into the cabin in ways that adding Dynamat cannot solve.  (Been there, and won’t be making that mistake again).

Roush Performance 3rd LinkRoush Performance’s 3rd Link is hands down the best option for all S197s that are driven on the street, and 99.9% of the cars that are taken to the track.  It has also won more professional races in the IMSA/Grand-Am GS class than any other 3rd Link on the market.

Roush Performance S197 Boss 302R 61 Billy Johnson Jack Roush JrGetting power to the ground was the key competitive advantage that Jack Roush Jr. and I had when competing with the S197 chassis (from the FR500C to the BOSS 302R) in the IMSA/Grand-Am GS class.  This was no easy task since these endurance racing cars weighed over 3,600lbs with driver, produced over 450 horsepower, and competed on skinny 275-width spec tires.

We tested over 10 different 3rd links from off the shelf products to our own designs. We quickly learned that having zero compliance from a spherical bearing or solid (and even perforated) polyurethane 3rd link transmits torque too quickly, shocking the tires and breaking traction.  This reduces rear grip and makes it more difficult to accelerate out of a corner.

The Roush Performance 3rd link consistently out-performed everything we tested, by a noticeable margin.  Lap times improved, tire wear was reduced, and the car was easier to drive.

Roush 3rd link BushingThe Roush 3rd link has a small, hard durometer rubber bushing that dampens the shock from the rear-end and greatly increases rear grip over a spherical or polyurethane bushing.  The Roush link is significantly stiffer than stock and eliminates wheel hop and unwanted movement and geometry changes.

This was a competitive advantage that we held over other Mustangs and enabled us to exit a corner with more grip and acceleration than any other car in the field.  This benefit, without increasing NVH, increases rear grip and performance that is much needed in almost every S197 application.

Roush 3rd link welded strapThe stamped steel link has a metal strap that wraps around the bushing and is welded to the backside of the arm.  This prevents the arm from cracking or ‘unwrapping’ from all of the torque it receives from acceleration and deceleration compressive and tension forces.  At Roush, we raced with this link for years without ever having to service or replace the arm or bushing.  They are quite durable.

Quick Reference:

Page 1 – Problem & Roush 3rd Link
Page 2 – Remove OEM 3rd Link
Page 3 – Install Roush 3rd Link & Conclusion

19 comments

  1. Hey Billy, nice writeup on a great upgrade. In the final picture, does that flag nut have enough reach to snug up to the 3rd link bracket (by rotating clockwise, i think) to resist loosening? Just curious.

    1. Thanks! Yes, it wasn’t tight when I took that pic and didn’t have a good shot after it was tight. Good eye!

  2. Honestly love live axle geometry stuff; as proven over and over it can work far better than people think.

    The last photo on the second page looks like there’s a geometry change going on too, shorter link on the Roush link – or is that just the photo? Cool thing is it looks like with the design of the mount there’s a lot of tweaks that are possible to do to geometry without cutting or welding on the unibody, which I never realized was like that on the S197.

    1. They are simple, yet effective. Yes, it’s slightly shorter but the angle makes it look like a big difference.

      1. Back from my S197 days, I seem to remember that Ford implemented a longer 3rd link arm in the 2011-2014 cars in order to lessen the pinion angle change of the rear axle as the axle went through bump and droop…

        I also remember talking to another Mustang team back than about 3rd links and they had the same to say about them: either stock or the Roush were the best options for circuit stuff really.

      2. Interesting; not familiar with the Ford geometry specifics, is it flattening out the angle of the upper?
        I know on, for example, the 1st gen RX-7 there got to be too much antisquat once you lowered the car unless you moved upper links around. And yeah agreed on simple but effective; I’m doing an SCCA GT-3 car so I’m fully onboard with live axles as a concept. 😉

    2. The arm is shorter than the factory 2011-2014 3rd link, but the same length as the 2005-2010 3rd link. On the 2011-2014 version, the 3rd link bracket has the holes in the bracket in a different place to keep geometry in the right place for customers that may simply replace their 3rd link on their otherwise stock geometry rear suspension car.

  3. Dynamat! Oh…. the memories from my younger days… Roush beefed up the heck out of that brackets compared to the OEM design. Good stuff.

  4. Nice writeup Billy. My S197 has a T56 Magnum XL swap with the single driveshaft, and I had to switch to an adjustable BMR 3rd link to correct the pinion angle to match the engine/trans angle. The highway speed vibration has gone away, but now I get that nice gear whine hum from running a poly bushing 3rd link which isn’t great. This Roush 3rd link looks like a great option for the reasons you described but would likely result in my pinion angle being out of alignment again. What is the best way to correct that with the Roush 3rd link? Would it be better to just adjust the lower control arms to bring the angle in, which could result in shortening the wheelbase some, or just live with the pinion angle being out?

  5. Billy,

    Great article and thank you for sharing your knowledge. The link included in the article references a 2005-2010 Roush Third Link. It looks like your build is on a 2014 S197 and I am trying to replicate this build on a 2013 S197. I’ve tried searching for a Roush Third link for a 2011-2014 S197 and I keep coming up empty. Will the 2005-2010 Third link work on a 2013 S197? If not, can you share a link on where we can find this? Thank you again.

  6. Billy,
    Enjoyed reading your articles. I have a 2013 Mustang 3.7 automatic. I read the article on the Roush 3rd link and want to get one installed. After some research I believe Roush made a 3rd link for the 11-14 Mustangs part #421120 which I believe has been discontinued. Just to confirm will the Roush 3rd link for 05-10 Mustangs work on my 2013 Mustang as I believe the 11-14 factory trailing arm is about an inch longer (~9.5″) than the 05-10 Mustangs factory trailing arm? My car has a 3.5″ Dynotech driveshaft with stock suspension. Will upgrade suspension down the road and probably not lower the car more than an 1-1.25″. Will the Roush 3rd link work when I lower the car or should I look at an adjustable UCA?

    1. Yes, the 05-10 Mustang 3rd link is what I used on this 2014 car (and obviously works). As mentioned in the article, the Roush link is the best in terms of performance and NVH for everything but a track car on slicks with a lot of aero.

  7. Hey Billy, this is a great series of articles and I’m proud to say almost all of the upgrades I’ve done to my 07 GT track car the past 4 seasons are in line with your philosophy. However, with the Roush third link there is no adjustability for pinion angle. I currently run a frpp one piece driveshaft with Steeda polyurethane adjustable third link. My research told me that adjustability is important to mitigate vibration and leaky pinion seals when running a one piece shaft. Was this a compromise in your race cars or is there a different way to adjust the Roush unit to set the correct angle?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*
*