Our 1992 NSX gets a make-over with a 2002 facelift conversion and subtle flared fenders from Downforce USA. This will help us fit wider tires in anticipation of more than doubling the car’s power from our soon to be assembled, turbocharged engine.
I’ve driven a lot of NSXs over the years. Everything from stock cars on up to arguably the fastest Time Attack car in the world (the FXMD NSX), and even the unicorn Spoon NSX-R GT. Having an extensive background with the platform, the 2002 NSX-R has always been one of my favorites alongside the first NSX I ever drove – the infamous 500whp Factor-X “FX500” NSX. This project will take the best aspects of each and turn it up significantly.
When it comes to widebody kit on NSXs, I’ve honestly never been a fan. Especially the current trend of cheap looking bolt-on fenders. This made my plans to bring the performance of the NSX up to the level of modern supercars a bit difficult because it is extremely difficult if not impossible to fit wide, modern rubber under stock fenders.
The lines of the 2002 NSX-R are just so iconic, and is the inspiration for this build.
I have a lot of appreciation for the original design and lines of the NSX, however I’ve always thought the ‘narrow-body’ fenders could use a slightly more muscular integrated flare like an E46 BMW M3 or C5 Audi S6. This would give the NSX a wider stance and better reflect the legendary handling the car is known for. Thankfully Downforce USA stepped up to the plate and used our NSX to develop a wider rear fender to accompany their 6mm wider front fender.
The last look of the front of the car shows the wear and tear on an old Wings West front lip that was molded into the factory bumper by the previous owner. There are many people who prefer the looks of the pop-up headlights to the 2002+ fixed headlights. Honestly, I really like both. Since the 2002 NSX-R’s design could pass for new today, has less drag, and is significantly lighter, it wasn’t too hard to let go of the old look.
People often incorrectly refer NSXs with pop-up headlights as “NA1” and fixed headlights as “NA2”. Even the owners of NSXs mess this up. “NA1” & “NA2” are chassis codes that coincide with the car’s drivetrain that went from the original 270bhp 3.0L engine and 5-speed manual to the 290hp 3.2L 6-speed in 1997. This means that all 1997+ cars are “NA2”; not just the 2002+ cars with the facelift.
KEY NOTES AND CHANGES:
1990-1994 – “NA1” – 3.0L, Throttle cable, 5-speed, Coupe, manual steering, OBD-I
1995-1996 – “NA1” – 3.0L, Drive-by-wire, 5-speed, Targa, Electronic Power Steering, OBD-II
1997-2001 – “NA2” – 3.2L, Drive-by-wire, 6-speed, Targa, Electronic Power Steering, OBD-II, larger brakes, improved ABS
2002-2006 – “NA2” – 3.2L, Drive-by-wire, 6-speed, Targa, Electronic Power Steering, OBD-II, larger brakes, new ABS module, Facelift with fixed headlights, new front bumper, new side skirts, new rear valence, new tail lights.
The only “NA2” coupes were the 1999 Zanardi edition, NSX-R, and a handful of very rare factory-requested coupes. The rest were Targas that were 100 lbs heavier and not as stiff as the Coupe. 1995 & 1996 are arguably the least popular years due to having the less powerful engine and the heavier & less stiff Targa chassis.
The rear of our car has had the 2002 side skirt and lower rear bumper update for many years. The only thing that’s left are the 2002 tail lights with amber turn signals.
13 comments
Amazing work, Billy!
Thanks James!
Epic finish. Love this project
Did performance friction discontinue their big brake kits?
I could probably get them make a few if a couple people get together and want to order a set.
Can I get updates?
Soon!
Amazing looking. Why not just run 18s front and rear though? The 19s look massive on such a small car.
Looks are subjective but NSXs look great with a diameter stagger. Plus, there are better tire options in 19″ for the rear.
Great job Billy and those involved with the project!
I have close to 300k miles on my CTSC E85’d 91, but I think I’ll keep her and consider an update instead of saving up for the NC1.
Why turbo vs. s/c?
Thank you, and it’s great to hear your NSX is being driven!
It’s pretty difficult to get air intake temps under control on supercharged NSXs during continuous use on road courses, plus that’s a lot of weight at nearly the highest part of the car -hurting the car’s center of gravity and handling. They are easy to install and improve the car’s torque and are GREAT on the street, but for this project, a turbo is a better route:
I’ve always been a turbo guy and the first NSX i’ve ever driven was turbocharged and made 500whp. Turbos are far more complex to install but there is so much more you can do with them. Many are done poorly with sub-par turbo sizing, engineering, components, and tuning. But when done right, they are incredible. I’m taking what was learned on the record-setting FXMD NSX Time Attack car, and pulling from world-class motorsports engineering to make the most advanced turbocharged NSX ever made. Stay tuned!
Hey, it’s cool you went to the Lookout Roadhouse above Lake Elsinore! My wife and I go there all the time for breakfast. Great view of the area from up on the moutains! They’ve made it through the pandemic, but barely.
I grew up and learned to drive Ortega Hwy. I’ve never eaten there but will have to try that sometime!