Unfortunately, looking at EVs isn’t quite as interesting as internal combustion engines. Here are two electric motors which basically looks like every other electric motor. It’s a cylinder with big wires coming out of it. Attached on top of the motors are the inverters I believe. Again, inverters all basically look alike being rectangular boxes with big electrical wires and coolant lines.
Audi is launching the big e-tron SUV thing.
Typically, the front motors, inverters, and things don’t take up as much space as your typical internal combustion engine, so there’s space for a frunk. This one looks to fit an 18-pack of beer cans. Bottles might be a tough fit. Though, you probably don’t want to store anything here that you don’t want getting warm (warm air coming off the front heat exchangers, A/C, etc), so beer in the frunk is probably a bad idea. I guess for the socialite types, a couple changes of clothes could go here. You know, in case you show up to a fancy event and someone has on the same outfit.
This rectangular box has high power cables attached and coolant lines. Yup, high power electronics need cooling.
Back to the more traditional is the badass Audi RS3.
13 comments
The planks on the Volkswagen: Side splitters. In principe the same as a front splitter, but less affective. Weight on top is higher then below, so downforce. And it prevents spillage of air out of the sides from under the car. And air entering onder the car from the sides.
As for the rear suspension: I have to see a wider angle as a reference to understand what I’m looking at?
the shape at the front of the tunnels looks weird.
There’s a round part in the body work that looks like half a wheel of cheese, in front of the rear suspension.
I’m actually thinking thats just soms weird glare or optical illusion? Because otherwise that looking like a surreal drawing or something like You see on the Esscherdrawings?
It’s an optical illusion. I Just blew it up on my monitor. Your mind is tricking you to see a convex shape, but it’s actually concave. Look at the other side: You won’t have that illusion on that side. It’s al down to the glare on.
Belt drives on e-bikes are the way forward. In addition to a quiet ride and next-to-zero maintenance, we are getting a minimum of 3x the life of a chain when paired with an electric motor.
I would agreeon the belt drive, but the frame is compromised because it has to have a break in it in order to replace the belt. That may be okay with a commuter bike, but really sucks for any bikes where weight and stiffness is a priority. I am not sure you could even do it with a carbon bike.
I think it is a little strange that cars moved from belt drive to chain drive, and bikes went the other direction.
Belt drives on bikes are ideal for a city environment. They require no maintenance, they’re clean (because there’s no chain lube), they’re quieter, and they last longer than chains. The downside is you can’t use derailleurs, but an internal gear hub or electric power fixes that.
Odometer Gears make replacement gears that they claim are much stronger for the S65/S85 throttle bodies, so you don’t have to spend $2000 for new parts.
http://www.odometergears.com/products/BMW/3+Series+E92+06-13/160
Not surprised on the life advantage of belts vs chains on e-bikes. It’s comical how small my road bike chain is compared to the chain on my CBR600RR. I probably put out an average of 125W on the bicycle and the electric motors are putting out way more in the 250-350W range.
Glad to hear someone came out with better replacement gears for the BMW throttle bodies. Just wish BMW would have selected a better material to start with. But, yeah… BMW only designs their cars to last the lease period and then fall apart based on my observations.
Your observations are correct. I always hear people say that they ‘wish they had a German car. ‘ But very few people know how poor the reliability is. I worked at a Euro car shop for awhile, and we knew what was wrong with the BMW’s before the customers could tell us. Every week we got calls for coolant leaks. Of course, it was always the plastic coolant overflow tank. To add insult to injury, it was a $150 part.
I think that BMW may have invented planned obsolescence. They certainly have taken it to a new level. Perhaps BMWs should be called, The Ultimate Maintenance Nightmare.
Yup. On the first gen of the BMW 335s with the twin turbo N54, water pump with plastic impeller was guaranteed to fail around 60k miles. About $400 in parts to replace. Remember when Mercedes use to tout their reliability and cars making it to one million miles? I think those days ended in the late 80s.
Sorry to be a grammar nazi, but they are called ‘disc brakes, not ‘disk brakes.
I used to think that hydraulic disc brakes were totally unnecessary on a bike. But after I got my first pair, I upgraded all my bikes (at least, on the front.) I am now a firm believer that you can never have ‘too much braking power.’ Especially, on a bike.
BTW, the UCI took forever to approve disc brakes for road bikes. Personally, I think it is dangerous NOT to have disc brakes. Do you really want to race down epic hills with rim brakes?
Also, carbon fiber wheels have the WORST friction coefficient, which makes even worse in the wet. Not to mention the fact that you are slowly destroying your megabuck carbon fiber wheels with every single pull on the levers. Additionally, the disc brake wheels are much easier to swap out, in case of flats or rim damage. This feature alone could be the difference between winning and losing a race.
I fixed it 🙂 I just have Zipp 30 aluminum wheels, so no wearing of fancy carbon for me. Some day a long time from now when I get a new bike, I’ll make sure it has disc brakes. I bought my wife a road bike with disc brakes. And her bike gets to stay in the living room while mine has to be in the garage. I think I’m doing it wrong.